4 Comments
User's avatar
C. King's avatar

"Overpricing"? BAH! The GOP doesn't WANT people to have health care.

What other reason could they have for TOTALLY PRICING REGULAR WORKING PEOPLE OUT OF BEING ABLE TO AFFORD IT WITHOUT RUINING THEIR PERSONAL ECONOMICS and just letting their sick children and elders die?

They're still fighting with FDR, and probably Social Security is next, if they and the Heritage Foundation have their way. <--now THERE's an oxymoron if I ever saw one. Unless you mean by "Heritage" and "Foundation," Tribal Kingships. They've forgotten that it's supposed to be FOR THE PEOPLE . . . but oh wait! I Forgot. They really want to kill the entire U.S. Constitution. Great big silly me.

In my view, this has Russell Vought's and Stephen Miller's grubby little fascist fingerprints all over it. And Donnie doesn't have time to even think about it--so intent on serving the oil and gas people is he with their suppression of the realities of climate change.

If they worry about a nasty version of communism taking over, they should remember that it's predatory capitalism that made it happen.

Michelle Jordan's avatar

Trump essentially threw his Vice President under the bus. Now JD Vance is waiting in the wings to do the same for the jaundiced felon.

C. King's avatar

I just had to write this somewhere: I am watching a GOP talking head on MSNBC this morning who was TRYING to give defense to Trump--and so he compared Trump.01 to Trump.02 and said that, in Trump.02 things are more STABLE than in Trump.01 was . . . whereupon Ana Cabrera interrupted him and said "WHAT?" . . . noting all the firings of Inspector Generals and anyone who wanted to tell the truth, etc., obviously put out by the speaker's comment.

Well, he replied that he was so glad she pointed to the firings, etc., however, he was actually speaking about Trump's team of advisors (as more stable).

Hmmmm . . . I thought. Then realized you could say the same thing about Putin--that is, the difference is that NOW in Trump2.0 he is surrounded by sycophants, yes-people, and other criminals. The principle is this: When you want "stability," surround yourself with sycophants, yes-people, and other criminals--voila! Stability. On the other hand, Trump1.0 had people who raised questions and pointed to the law, and were willing to say "no." Unstable, I suppose.

This guy was just another disingenuous puppet, speaking for the grand puppeteer Trump.