28 Comments
User's avatar
Noah Dowd's avatar

Can you imagine the noise that would come from the right if a Democratic president even thought about half the stuff Trump is doing?

Ivan Tufaart's avatar

I was thinking the same thing. I'd bet my last buck that the SCROTUS will change its tune when a Democrat occupies the Oval Office (from my keyboard to The Lord's eyes)

last time?'s avatar

And from the "fake" news too. If no man is above the law, does that mean Donald Trump is not a man?

Kim Sherwood's avatar

“Congress has not ceded unfettered authority to the Executive Branch to dramatically redesign, reshape, and reconstruct the White House—the People’s House—to fit a particular President’s desires.”

The hell they haven't--at least the majority who happen to be Republicans!

This decision is so obviously biased in trump's favor, it makes me wonder, once again, who among the Supreme justices are in the Epstein files and what other bribes have brought the majority to heel.

BosPhotoGuy's avatar

"It is frightening to see the five conservative justices twist the facts and ignore the law to allow Trump to do something that is clearly illegal and unconstitutional. Whether the ballroom is built is far less important than the court undermining the rule of law in this way."

We are about to get the ultimate test of the SCOTUS support of Trump with their shadow docket decision regarding the post office scheme to remove ballots. My feeling is if they allow this scheme to go forward, the only solution is for ordinary people to hit the streets.

Michelle Jordan's avatar

Totally disgusting and reckless these 5 fascist judges are. I am not calling them Justices they have not earned that title especially when they’re allowing unlawful and unconstitutional actions by this felon president.

Nadine Bangerter's avatar

Thank you for this outline of the case and the Supreme Court's failure to uphold the Constitution.

This court is a disgrace.

Vincent Guacci's avatar

The bought and paid for right-wing Supreme Court is doing what their billionaire backers want, the law and the Constitution be damned.

Dan Ellerhorst's avatar

It is hard to fathom that our legal system basically says no one has “standing” i.e. is demonstrably harmed - when our elected president breaks the law. Forget the “aesthetics” of the monstrosity of a ballroom - if we cannot complain and stop our president when he breaks the law - then give me George III back - at least he had to listen to parliament. Our “king” is untouchable. Louis XIV is smiling. 😡

Elizabeth Fenlon's avatar

The author of this essay is a most highly qualified law professor at a top law school. He knows of what he speaks. The 5 hacks on the SupCt are obviously captured and are no longer independent, legitimate jurists.

Elizabeth Fenlon's avatar

And Roberts isn’t any better.

Lisa Jean Walker's avatar

Roberts is different (though not better) because he knows how bad this decision makes the Supreme Court look. The others seem out-of-touch/clueless about that. Hacks is right.

Justin Sayne's avatar

“ It is frightening to see the five conservative justices twist the facts and ignore the law to allow Trump to do something that is clearly illegal and unconstitutional”

And Shameful. Deeply Shameful. They have abdicated their duty to prevent breaches of the law. The Supine Court has failed us all. We need a system that enables us to remove these biased, and incompetent, bad actors.

Marcus's avatar

Thank you for your commentary. If there is no rule of law, there is no purpose for a Supreme Court that no longer functions to fairly interpret and uphold our Constitution and the laws of our land. It feels like the Republican Congress and the Supreme Court have now adopted the same technique that protected Susan Collins. And the Miserable 5 have stepped in to replace Congress, since they believe Congress should act but isn't. So we'll act in their place and allow a lawless President to use taxpayer money to build illegal monuments to himself. These issues were not debated or voted upon, nor was the structure of the President's campaign.

So now we can add two more things to our mountain of problems. The Supreme Court is supporting illegal actions by a convicted criminal who doesn't support the Constitution, and they have replaced a non-functioning Republican Congress despite not having that power. They have simply usurped the power.

The second thing is globally existential, and that is the collapse of the Himalayan glaciers that has tragically created floods and rock slides that damaged human settlements. I had hoped we would have acted on the science that links carbon-based energy (oil, that is) to the increase in global warming. Instead, our country chose to elect a President who openly solicited bribes from the global oil industry in the form of donations to his bank accounts, payable in crypto, dollars, and gold bars, etc. In repayment to his friends, he chose to kidnap Venezuela's President, steal their oil, and set up a JV with a lawless South American criminal family. Then he chose to attack Iran and light the Middle East oilfields on fire to completely pollute our climate.

None of these things serve the "American People", remember, "We the People"? Trump never did, and sadly now we know that our Supreme Court is not ours any longer. And now we are exposed.

Diane Ingersoll's avatar

WHERE is the White House in that picture? It's impossible to even see it in the construction mess!

Klarity's avatar

Maybe next Mad King Donald will take a wrecking ball to the Supreme Court building and replace it with a wrestling ring for his staged fights. What’s to stop him? Literally nothing, according to the fascist wing of the “highest court in the land.” And the Roberts Court has very clearly demonstrated their belief that the Supreme Court has no function in government anymore, ceding all power to the executive. By that logic, there is no reason for them to convene any longer, or hear cases, or collect salaries that WE pay for. So tear down their building, give them all pink slips, take away their salaries, health care, and benefits. See if they feel the same way then if Thomas and Alito and the others can’t accept bribes and cruise and dine with billionaires.

Michael David Flynn's avatar

I guess this’ll mean we’ll soon have an Arc de Trump. But it’ll also mean a future administration could demolish these structures. As usual, chaos from the Roberts court.

Douglas Kelso's avatar

Once Democrats get back into power, Congress needs to rebuild the judicial branch in a way that strips the Supreme Court of nearly all of its power.

As for the destruction of the East Wing, it's illegal. Once we have a Democratic AG again, everyone involved in destroying the White House, from Trump downward, can be charged under 18 U.S.C. §1361 for destruction of federal property. That carries a sentence of up to ten years in prison, and Trump also can be fined for the damage. If I'm reading 18 U.S.C. §3571(d) correctly, he could be charged for "not more than *** twice the gross loss" tp the USA from having the East Wing demolished. What was the East Wing worth? Prosecute Trump and let a jury sort it out.

Carrie's avatar

The Roberts Court is worse than Trump. He doesn’t bother even pretending to care about the rule of law, while the Spurious Six use the pretense of it to license its very destruction.

Pat Jones Garcia's avatar

Yes, it is frightening for the Supreme Court to ignore the rule of law and allow the current president to get by with such garbage. Especially to ignore necessary budgeting and waste our tax dollars in such a manner.