It is indeed a very sad day when the Supreme Court can allow a President to overthrow part of the Constitution by Executive Order. The Constitution lays out very clearly the process for changing the Constitution, and it does NOT include a Presidential Executive Order. Perhaps the Supreme Court should consider reading the Constitution?
This particular Supreme Court, purposely imbalanced courtesy of Mitch McConnell, does not interpret the law, and justice; the rewrite it, and edit it ... as if they know better than the founders. They are "originalists," but only in one sense; the Republican appointees has a very original take on what the Constitution says, and what their role is ... in turning it on its head.
The Roberts Supreme Court reminds me of a pack of Komodo dragons. Each bite is poisonous, but the victim dies from multiple bites, delivered over the course of time, as the dragons patiently stalks their prey until it’s dead.
It is indeed a very sad day when the Supreme Court can allow a President to overthrow part of the Constitution by Executive Order. The Constitution lays out very clearly the process for changing the Constitution, and it does NOT include a Presidential Executive Order. Perhaps the Supreme Court should consider reading the Constitution?
This particular Supreme Court, purposely imbalanced courtesy of Mitch McConnell, does not interpret the law, and justice; the rewrite it, and edit it ... as if they know better than the founders. They are "originalists," but only in one sense; the Republican appointees has a very original take on what the Constitution says, and what their role is ... in turning it on its head.
The Roberts Supreme Court reminds me of a pack of Komodo dragons. Each bite is poisonous, but the victim dies from multiple bites, delivered over the course of time, as the dragons patiently stalks their prey until it’s dead.