Morning Roundup: The Undaunted and the Conflicted
Featuring Jen Rubin's Undaunted figure of the Week, Kathleen Clark's
Happy Friday, Contrarians!
We introduce the conclusion of this long, consequential week by honoring our Undaunted figure(s).
Professor of Law Kathleen Clark revisits a Whitehouse press secretary’s gaffe (it’s fine, she probably doesn’t know) and the larger inaccuracies and implications of her statement.
And finally, for a slightly different perspective on Elon, enjoy this week’s installment of our favorite comic, Ruben Bolling, and Tom the Dancing Bug:
Be sure to check back in throughout the day for rigorous journalism, cookie recipes, Superbowl-prep, and our Contrarian Pet of the Week…
Thank you all!
In case you missed any content yesterday, please enjoy a bit of a menu from our evening roundup.
Evening Roundup: On Unions, Civil Rights, Public Health, and more!
Good evening Contrarians!
On Unions, Civil Rights, Public Health, and more...
IMPORTANT -- Language: We need an easy way to identify information coming from the current administration vs. former administrations. For example, when an article says " . . .the Department of Energy said: . . ." I want to know which DOE -- the current one or the (correct) one from "before"? Can we use "BT" and "AT"?
This is disappointing me. I want to read facts with informed analysis, but the adjectives you include, like “creepy” oligarch, makes me not trust your neutral reporting. I don’t mind the occasional joke post, but overall, I’m looking for what you can’t find on msnbc or cnn or fox: unrelentless commitment to the truth, educating us with facts and perspective. I’m so tired of the adjectives.