22 Comments
User's avatar
Nick's avatar

"Justice Alito’s opinion said the President’s statements weren’t racist and didn’t establish racial animus toward Haitians." Alito also said Black Americans voted for Democrats in both the AL and SC racial gerrymandering cases and the State legislatures were only using partisan gerrymandering, despite the lower courts findings that the legislatures were racially gerrymandering the districts.

The current Supreme Court, made up of six Christian Nationalists and three Justices who follow the Constitution is illegitimate. There's no such thing as Presidential immunity anywhere in the Constitution. There's no such thing as the "Major Questions Doctrine" anywhere in the Constitution. Roe, as Kavanaugh said, was precedent on precedent. The SC, AL and LA racial redistricting decisions thwarted the will of Congress in the 1982 amendment to the Voting Rights Act, signed by Ronald Reagan.

David Parrish's avatar

Yes, shameful decisions, not to mention Alito's public rebuff to Sotomayor's public reading of the dissent. This Court is literally lawless, partisan, and more divided by a wide margin than any Court in my lifetime. Six highly partisan and mostly Catholic justices acting as if they had never read the Bible, the teachings of Jesus, let alone the Constitution or the laws passed by Congress. Roberts is a failure. The rest, save the 3 liberals, are detached from reality. Sickening are the consequences of their narrow-mindedness.

Nick's avatar

Just as a clarification. There are not three "liberal" Justices. There are three Justices who follow the rule of law and the Constitution.

Anne Jenkins's avatar

Impeachment proceedings need to be started immediately after the Democrats take control in January 2027 against six of the Supreme Court justices that are violating the constitution and lied to get their positions

Laura's avatar

I fear for birthright citizenship. We may not lose it in this round, but it is coming. Like voting rights laws, this Supreme Court is whittling until it can get the law to a point with new lawsuits that will make it easy to kill. I don't know if Democrats will ever take the bold steps necessary to rebalance this court, but the country can't continue down this path too much longer. We have at least two thoroughly corrupt and ideologically bent justices. Whether the other conservatives are, too, is a moot question. They join those two nearly always to undermine and rewrite large sections of the constitution as if they are, alone, their own constitutional convention.

The second thing we must do is develop a revised constitution to strengthen existing laws and add new provisions that meet the challenges and crises we face now around voting, police power, judicial restraint, corruption, and removal of corrupt officials. If we can't revise our constitution to meet these challenges, we shouldn't be surprised that one ideologically driven political party continues to find ways to shred and break it, hike the other party is unable to effectively stop it.

Joel Wizansky's avatar

I just saw it in a flash: this barrage of Alito opinions is his swan song. He will retire this summer to ensure that Trump can push through an equally fanatical successor with a friendly, supine Senate.

ScottD's avatar

Yeah, I'd guess that at the latest, if the Senate flips in November Alito and Thomas will both retire and Thune will try to Barrett a couple of replacement jackbooted "justices" through before January.

Joel Wizansky's avatar

Nice use of Barrett as a verb.

Diane Doyle's avatar

We are tired of having to grin and Barrett.

Leah's avatar

These decisions are horrifying.

barbara jacobsen's avatar

Heartless.

That's the only word that can describe this action.

By the way, Norwegians and Swedes do not ever want to come here! They think we are nuts! They take care. We do not.

Kim Sherwood's avatar

Time and time again, the majority on the Supreme Court have ruled as if they were obligated to trump, arguably their Supreme Leader. Why??

In the Celtic knot of time and circumstances, I have to wonder if any among them are in the Epstein files. Could any of them be the "friends that could be hurt" that trump told Marjorie Taylor Green about? I know it sounds far-fetched, but far stranger things have happened.

One thing is for sure. The one-time fair and respected arbitrators of the law seem to have come completely unmoored from their judicial supremacy rooted in the Constitution and now seem to answer to one man. Why???

Dawn Essink's avatar

I hope you’re right about birthright citizenship….I, quite honestly, have zero faith in any decision they “should” make!

Diane Doyle's avatar

Now, thanks to our regime and the Supreme Court, our immigration policy can be described by a playground chant from childhood, "Tick Tock, the game is locked. Nobody else can play....". And the consequences for immigrants are even worse than turning black and blue because of getting hit by a shoe.

A doc reads's avatar

Likely to be true, Laura.

Why couldn’t God, in her wisdom, strike down those morally rotten justices??

Sigh. We the People will have to use every power and law we have to out maneuver them out of power.

A doc reads's avatar

Calling on the Mighty Katie Phang.

Don your armor, Katie, we will fight with you. Tell us what you need.