So now the magaloids are tailoring our intelligence reports for ideological and political purposes, rather than for clear-eyed assessment of intelligence situations and risks? What could possibly go wrong?
No surprise here. Bad actors always want analyses to mirror their beliefs or goals, while straight and unbiased analyses are always just statements of fact. Nothing more, nothing less.
If I’m reading this correctly, policy makers are now getting intelligence reports that ARE biased, after the declaration that bias has been removed. No surprise there.
So now the magaloids are tailoring our intelligence reports for ideological and political purposes, rather than for clear-eyed assessment of intelligence situations and risks? What could possibly go wrong?
Krasnov in charge.
No surprise here. Bad actors always want analyses to mirror their beliefs or goals, while straight and unbiased analyses are always just statements of fact. Nothing more, nothing less.
Don’t trust the BEA analysis either, be wise.
If I’m reading this correctly, policy makers are now getting intelligence reports that ARE biased, after the declaration that bias has been removed. No surprise there.